Time to shatter this fake taboo

The first thing any criminal would do to exonerate himself and blame others for the crime committed is to erase all  traces of his guilt and demonize the victim.

If proved impossible to hide, he would simply intimidate potential witnesses or lure them into complicity in partnership or association.

This is exactly what the masterminds of this racist, expansionist, nihilist entity planted in the Middle East have done to put their sinister plan into motion.

Knowing that they have sponsored a vile project based on the gradual, but steady annihilation of all peoples of the region, as per a phased-out pre-prepared time-schedule, they have devised a psychological stunt to scare skeptics away.

The “idea” upon which this entity was based is so absurd and too illogical to be digested by any sane person, because it combines a weird  cocktail of contradictory, unrelated  and often out of context bits and pieces of  mythology, religion, and misrepresented history brought together in an explosive recipe for endless wars.

So to force this unsalable cocktail on the public opinion,  they have invented in advance a preemptive intellectual weapon of mass silencing to  preempt any potential objection to their destructive and nihilist project.

This weapon was devised in the form of the “Anti-Semitism” accusation, which they forcefully use against anyone who dares to say that the Emperor is without cloth. But is not it high time to smash this  fake taboo?  The answer is undoubtedly: YES. This pseudo-psychological  weapon is in fact a cover under which they are perpetrating a mass-scale, collective and indiscriminate  genocide against all peoples of the region with no exemptions.

Let us remember that the masterminds of this nihilist project have adopted a Satanist  idea when they “revived”  and “reactivated”  some excerpts taken out of context from an age-old  religious text that has been in dormant for thousands of years now.

They went even as far as forcing world countries to endorse such insanity in the body of  international laws and regulations, as if it were the only ultimate truth. This excerpt is a  vague “promise” allegedly given by their  own “god” to the ‘children of Israel’ to inherit “the promised land”.

Such stories can be taken as a theme for certain fictional works of literature, mythology or epics, but to take it literally and to factually uproot an existing people on its basis, is beyond all imagination.

It goes without saying that religious texts can be read,  interpreted or understood  in so many different ways, so it is more than awkward to see  such a text be incorporated into the bodies of international politics and be adopted as a law banning opponents from criticizing it.

The key question to be asked is the following: Since the masterminds of this project  have managed to revive and reactivate such an ancient text dating back to thousands of years  and  turned it into a reality in present-day politics, how can we be so sure that they would not go to the next step and activate  some similar and relevant  texts, especially when such systematic practices are being committed with impunity on the ground and under the watch of the entire world.

And since this alleged promise has been taken out of context from the Old  Testament to justify the stealing of the land of others, then one may wisely suspect that they would equally activate  the harrowing text of Deutronomy  19:10, which literally reads as the following: “When thou comest  nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace upon it.

11- And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall  serve thee.

12- And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it, 13- And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite , every male thereof with the edge of the sword;

14- But the women and the little ones and the cattle and all that is in the city, even all the  spoils thereof, shalt  thou take unto thyself, and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies which the Lord thy God hath given  thee.

15- This shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breathes:

17 – But thou shalt utterly destroy  them, namely the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee:

18 – That they teach you not to do after all their abominations, which  they have done unto their gods; so should ye sin against the Lord thy God.” This is a literal quotation from the authorized version, known also as “King James Version”. So, peoples of the region can do nothing to evade annihilation.

With such a text overtly  calling for the total  annihilation of all peoples  of the region only because they differ with them religiously  and have their own way of worshipping  their own god,  how different is such mentality and nihilist ideology from that of ISIS?

Are not they the same, with only one  single difference, namely that the international community has endorsed one of them publicly  and rejected the other publicly but continued to support  it covertly., How  did the international community condoned such a genocidal agenda and why has not any of the so-called  “human rights” organizations said anything about it? How  did they manage to legalize crime and criminalize everyone who dares to expose its perpetrators? All of this is being committed  under the cover of a fake political,

financial, religious taboo enforced on the international landscape  to preempt any objection. Those who dared to tell the truth have been labelled as “anti-Semites”.

This, in itself shows  the fact that this accusation is a mere fake taboo to cover up the actual  nihilist genocidal agenda being systematically perpetrated against the peoples of the region.

In other words, any one who condones the idea that some groups of peoples are “entitled”  to “return” to the so-called “promised land” are in fact complicit in the genocide that has been perpetrated and is still being  perpetrated against all peoples of the region, either directly through military force by the invaders  or indirectly through proxies and other crisis-initiations.

Equally so is the misleading term of the so-called “Israel security”. Because this misleading term is being translated directly as a cart blanche for the mass-killing of all the peoples living in the region, simply because they have their own way of worshipping their God. How different is this from the nihilist mindset and ideology of the Daesh (ISIS) terror group? Is not it the same ideology with only a different marketing package? And how could this be acceptable to the “civilized” international community? Is this the paradigm of “justice and international law” in the 21st century? The answer should clearly be a loud NO.

So, is not it high time to smash this fake taboo?





اترك تعليق

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of