What is not being said about the quadrilateral summit on Syria in Istanbul?

According to the writer, Thierry Meyssan, The subject of the disagreement, which is not even mentioned in the communiqué, is the Syrian Constitution, adopted by referendum in 2012. And thatafter having thought about applying to Syria the federal model of ethnic Republics, Russia had to admit that the situation of Syria is completely different from its own.

In Syria, the communities are not settled geographically. Moscow therefore has no intention of interfering in the debate.Meyssan also said that From the Turkish point of view, it would seem to be a good idea to reiterate in Syria what was done in Cyprus.

In 1974, the fake operation « Cyprus Peace Process » was labelled with the more explicit code name of « Operation Attila ». It was aimed at annexing the North of the island – with the consent of Henry Kissinger, Today, « Operation Olive Branch » may permit the annexation of the North of Syria and therefore partially realize the « Oath of Atatürk ».as for France; the writer says that Paris persists in fantasizing about the « mandate » given by the League of Nations (1920) in application of the Sykes-Picot agreement (1915).Using the same vocabulary.

In New York, President François Hollande evoked the necessity of establishing a new

 « mandate » over Syria. His successor, Emmanuel Macron, assured that it was necessary to organize a « period of transition », without ever daring to try and explain between what and what.Following this ideology, France also considered the creation of a « Kurdish national homeland » on the model set up by the British in Palestine.

As for Germany; whatever the Constitution says, they have to get these Syrians migrating again (these people who had been displaced on the demand of NATO and German big business), and send them back where they came from.

From a strategic point of view, the operation which was intended to empty the country of its inhabitants did not lead to victory. From an economic point of view, it had not been possible to integrate the great majority of the migrants into the sector of heavy industry. German electors therefore reproached Chancellor Merkel with having forced them to carry the weight of social aid.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *